Written By: Mark Renne 3-13-2010

Revelations Nicolations and Santa Claus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaism

Nicolaism (also Nicholaism, Nicolationism, or Nicolaitanism) is a Christian heresy, first

mentioned (twice) in the Book of Revelation of the New Testament, whose adherents were

called Nicolaitans, Nicolaitanes, or Nicolaites. According to Revelation 2, v. 6 and 15, they

were known in the cities of Ephesus and Pergamon.  the church at Ephesus is commended for "hating

the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate" and the church in Pergamon is blamed for "having them

who hold their [the Nicolaitans'] doctrines". There is no other first-hand evidence to give us certainty about the nature of

this sect. Yet, they are mentioned in Revelations.

Hippolytus of Rome states that the deacon Nicolas was the author of the heresy and the sect. Several of the early

church fathers, including Irenaeus, Epiphanius, and Theodoret mentioned this group. Irenaeus discusses them but adds

nothing to the Apocalypse except that "they lead lives of unrestrained indulgence." Victorinus of Pettau states that they

ate things offered to idols. Bede states that Nicolas allowed other men to marry his wife and Thomas Aquinas

believed that Nicholas supported either polygamy or the holding of wives in common. Eusebius said that the sect was

short-lived.

However, "Nicolaitan" (Greek) is the name ostensibly given to followers of the heretic Nicolas (Greek) he name itself

meaning "victorious over people," or "victory of the people," which he would have been given at birth.

The name Balaam is perhaps capable of being interpreted as a Hebrew equivalent of the Greek Nicolas. Some

commentators think that this is alluded to by St. John in Revelation 2:14; and C. Vitringa argues forcibly in

support of this opinion. Albert Barnes notes:

Vitringa supposes that the word is derived from victory, and people, and that thus it corresponds with the name Balaam, as

meaning either lord of the people, or he destroyed the people; and that, as the same effect was produced by their    

doctrines as by those of Balaam, that the people were led to commit fornication and to join in idolatrous worship, they

might be called Balaamites or Nicolaitanes--that is, corrupter's of the people. But to this it may be replied,

 That it is far-fetched, and is adopted only to remove a difficulty;

There is every reason to suppose that the word here used refers to a class of people who bore that name, and who were

well known in the two churches specified; that, in Rev 2:15 , they are expressly distinguished from those who held the

doctrine of Balaam, Rev 2:14 --"So hast thou also ( those that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes."

—    Albert Barnes, New Testament Notes:

Cyrus Scofield, in his Notes on the Bible, following dispensationalist thought, suggests that the Seven Letters in Revelation

foretell the various eras of Christian history, and that "Nicolaitans" "refers to the earliest form of the notion of a priestly

order, or 'clergy,' which later divided an equal brotherhood into 'priests' and 'laity.'"

“The Nicolas of Acts 6:5 was a native of Antioch and a proselyte (convert to Judaism) and then a

follower of the way of Christ. When the Church was still confined to Jerusalem, he was chosen by

the whole multitude of the disciples to be one of the first seven deacons, and he was ordained by

the apostles, c. AD 33. It has been questioned whether this Nicolas was connected with the

Nicolaitans mentioned in Revelation, and if so, how closely. The Nicolaitans themselves, at least as

early as the time of Irenaeus, claimed him as their founder. It is noticeable (though the

documents themselves sit not of much weight as evidence) that in two instances the Nicolaitans

are said to be "falsely so called" No coincidence that St. Nicolas of Roman Catholicism was

transformed into Santa Claus.

http://www.cgg.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Library.sr/CT/PW/k/46/Nicolaitanism-Today.htm

http://jahtruth.net/xmas.htm

http://www.cgg.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Library.sr/CT/BQA/k/154/What-Is-Origin-of-Nicolaitans-Revelation-26-15.htm

Others think that the Nicolas mentioned in Revelation 2 is the man called "Nicolas, a proselyte from Antioch," ordained a

deacon early in the church's history in Acts 6:1-6. Writings of the time say he later came to follow Gnostic teachings and

became an ascetic, and many followed his new doctrine. For further information on this Nicolas and his affect on the

church, please see Nicolaitanism Today.

Read more http://www.cgg.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Library.sr/CT/BQA/k/154/What-Is-Origin-of-Nicolaitans-Revelation-26-15.htm#ixzz20IgLQSQx

http://www.zianet.com/maxey/reflx73.htm

Many early church writers feel it was this particular proselyte of Antioch who eventually departed from the faith and

adversely influenced others with his strange and deadly doctrine. About a hundred years after the writing of Revelation, an

early church writer by the name of Hippolytus wrote: "Nicolaus, as one of the seven (that were chosen) for the deaconate,

was appointed by the Apostles. (But Nicolaus) departed from correct doctrine, and was in the habit of inculcating

indifference of both life and food. And when the disciples (of Nicolaus) continued to offer insult to the Holy Spirit, John

reproved them in the Apocalypse as fornicators and eaters of things offered unto idols."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzfVrFuhLAA

http://youtu.be/RzfVrFuhLAA

I have been looking for this evidence for so long to fit the final piece of the puzzle together concerning the Nicolations. The

Catholic church officially made Saint Nicolas mentioned in Acts a saint. The Catholic Church represents the modern day

Nicolations Revelations speaks of with very convincing evidence now.

http://youtu.be/0KQ0rn0Litk

http://eternalgod.org/booklet/1243

“Closely associated with the giving of presents at Christmas time is the figure of Santa Claus, also called St. Nicholas...

According to legend, there was a Catholic priest who allegedly gave gifts to children in December. This priest was

supposedly the Bishop of Myra, and he was called Nicholas. He reportedly died on December 6, 326 AD. This is the ‘official’ explanation, as to why the ‘day of St.

Nicholas is celebrated today on December 6. Many historians doubt, however, that there is any legitimacy to this legend.

They even question whether such a priest ever existed...

http://youtu.be/iROP7jVU_Xg

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_did_St._Nicholas_become_a_saint

St Nicholas was never actually officially canonised, as this was not a common practice in the early church, being only

instituted in the 12th century. It was common custom in those days for his devoted followers to simply spread word of his

generosity and righteousness, thereby creating a larger following. By the Middle Ages, he came to be venerated as

"people's saint", and churches and villages were named after him. Thus, his "evolution" into sainthood occurred over a

period of hundreds of years.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_did_St._Nicholas_become_a_saint#ixzz20Iqpkct8

http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=004ahC

“It is the image of St. Nicholas more often than that of any other that is found on Byzantine seals; in the later middle ages

nearly four hundred churches were dedicated in his honor in England alone; and he is said to have been represented by

Christian artists more frequently than any saint except our Lady. St. Nicholas is venerated as the patron saint of several

classes of people, especially, in the East, of sailors and in the West of children. The first of these patronage is probably due

to the legend that during his life time, he appeared to storm tossed mariners who invoked his aid off the coast of Lycia and

brought them safely to port. Sailors in the Aegean and Ionian seas, following a common Eastern custom, had their "star of

St. Nicholas" and wished one another a good voyage in the phrase "May St. Nicholas hold the tiller". The legend of the

"three children" gave rise to his patronage of children and various observances, ecclesiastical and secular, connected there

with; such were the boy bishop and especially in Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands, the giving of presents in his

name at Christmas time. This custom in England is not a survival from Catholic times. It was popularized in America by the

Dutch Protestants of New Amsterdam who had converted the popish saint into a Nordic magician (Santa Claus = Sint

Klaes = Saint Nicholas) and was apparently introduced into this country by Bret Harte. It is not the only "good old English

custom" which, however good, is not "old English", at any rate in its present form. The deliverance of the three imperial

officers naturally caused St. Nicholas to be invoked by and on behalf of prisoners and captives, and many miracles of his

intervention are recorded in the middle ages...” ultimately transformed into Santa Claus.

“Curiously enough the greatest popularity of St. Nicholas is found neither in the eastern Mediterranean nor north-western

Europe, great as that was, but in Russia. With St. Andred the Apostle he is patron of the nation, and the Russian Orthodox

Church even observes the feast of his translation; so many Russian pilgrims came to Bari before the revolution that their

government supported a church, hospital and hospice there. He is a patron saint also of Greece, Apulia, Sicily and Loraine,

and of many cities and dioceses (including Galway) and churches innumerable. At Rome the basilica of St. Nicholas in the

Jail of Tully (in Carcere) was founded between the end of the sixth and the beginning of the seventh centuries. He is named

in the preparation of the Byzantine Mass.”

http://www.catholic-saints.info/patron-saints/list-of-patron-saints-patronage.htm

According to Catholic Straight Answers :”Yes, there is a Santa Claus.  However, we know him more as St. Nicholas. 

Unfortunately, we have little historical evidence about this popular saint.(he is not a saint officially)  Tradition holds that he

was born in Patara in Lycia, a province in Asia Minor, in the mid-200s.  He was born to a rather wealthy Christian family,

and benefited from a solid Christian upbringing.  Some say that at age five he began to study the teachings of the Church. 

He practiced virtue and piety.”

Factual Proof of the heresy and demonic deception in the Vatican theology.